Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from Western Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 341,875,859 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Africa within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.158. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Western Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 1.1 Immigrants from Western Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $40,294, a difference of 21.1%), median household income ($67,879 compared to $79,490, a difference of 17.1%), and median family income ($80,908 compared to $94,638, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $49,621, a difference of 4.0%), householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $57,119, a difference of 9.7%), and wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (19.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 50.2%), married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 41.7%), and single father poverty (22.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 11.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 13.3%), and receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 40.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 36.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 0.92%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 30.9%), births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 19.6%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.40%), currently married (42.8% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 0.99%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 51.5%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 42.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 15.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 34.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 44.9%), bachelor's degree (26.3% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 37.3%), and professional degree (3.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.12%), 10th grade (92.2% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and 8th grade (95.2% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Western Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 60.5%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 55.6%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 10.6%).