Arapaho vs Luxembourger Community Comparison
COMPARE
Arapaho
Luxembourger
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Arapaho
Luxembourgers
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Luxembourger Integration in Arapaho Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,384,219 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.467. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.149% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 149.0 Luxembourgers.
Arapaho vs Luxembourger Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $45,663, a difference of 41.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $103,536, a difference of 36.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $97,237, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $60,967, a difference of 2.7%), householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $50,379, a difference of 14.5%), and wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 16.9%).
Income Metric | Arapaho | Luxembourger |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,345 | Exceptional $45,663 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,064 | Excellent $106,183 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,965 | Good $86,418 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,586 | Excellent $47,640 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $41,758 | Excellent $56,300 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $31,489 | Average $39,891 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,003 | Tragic $50,379 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $71,697 | Excellent $97,237 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $75,945 | Excellent $103,536 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,383 | Average $60,967 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.5% | Tragic 27.4% |
Arapaho vs Luxembourger Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (12.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 75.2%), married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 69.3%), and single male poverty (21.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 64.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 17.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 17.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 20.6%).
Poverty Metric | Arapaho | Luxembourger |
Poverty | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Families | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 17.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.2% | Tragic 20.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.8% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 13.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 13.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.4% | Excellent 20.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 24.0% | Tragic 17.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.4% | Excellent 28.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.7% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Arapaho vs Luxembourger Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 187.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 166.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 146.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Arapaho | Luxembourger |
Unemployment | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Males | Tragic 11.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Females | Tragic 8.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 25.2% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 10.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Arapaho vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 21.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 13.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 7.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Arapaho | Luxembourger |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.1% | Exceptional 66.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 74.4% | Exceptional 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.3% | Exceptional 45.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.8% | Exceptional 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 76.6% | Exceptional 86.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.5% | Exceptional 86.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 78.1% | Exceptional 86.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.1% | Exceptional 85.0% |
Arapaho vs Luxembourger Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 60.1%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 30.6%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 5.1%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 15.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Arapaho | Luxembourger |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.5% | Tragic 63.3% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.6% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.8% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.64 | Tragic 3.10 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.5% | Exceptional 49.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 47.1% | Exceptional 29.4% |
Arapaho vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 41.2%), no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 37.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 2.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 26.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Arapaho | Luxembourger |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 5.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.7% | Exceptional 94.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.2% | Exceptional 59.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 26.4% | Exceptional 20.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Excellent 6.6% |
Arapaho vs Luxembourger Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 66.0%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 60.6%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.050%), 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and 5th grade (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.070%).
Education Level Metric | Arapaho | Luxembourger |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Exceptional 95.4% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.4% | Exceptional 94.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Exceptional 93.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Exceptional 91.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.8% | Exceptional 88.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.3% | Exceptional 68.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.1% | Exceptional 62.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.7% | Exceptional 48.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 26.6% | Excellent 39.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.0% | Good 15.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.9% | Good 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.2% | Excellent 1.9% |
Arapaho vs Luxembourger Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 42.3%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 34.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 3.7%).
Disability Metric | Arapaho | Luxembourger |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.1% | Exceptional 21.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.8% | Exceptional 44.8% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |