Ethiopian vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ethiopian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ethiopians

Luxembourgers

Good
Excellent
7,266
SOCIAL INDEX
70.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
126th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Ethiopian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,922,646 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.031. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to an increase of 0.3 Luxembourgers.
Ethiopian Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Ethiopian vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 25.6%), median female earnings ($43,243 compared to $39,891, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,818 compared to $50,379, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,243 compared to $56,300, a difference of 0.10%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,736 compared to $103,536, a difference of 0.19%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,824 compared to $97,237, a difference of 0.43%).
Ethiopian vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricEthiopianLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,569
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,251
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,640
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$49,572
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,243
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,243
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,818
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,824
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,736
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,989
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.8%
Tragic
27.4%

Ethiopian vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 31.6%), single father poverty (13.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 26.3%), and family poverty (8.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 2.7%), single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.0%).
Ethiopian vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricEthiopianLuxembourger
Poverty
Average
12.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Average
11.1%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Good
13.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.2%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.5%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Average
16.3%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.5%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Average
16.5%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
13.5%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.7%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
9.1%

Ethiopian vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 17.8%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.4%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.71%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Ethiopian vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricEthiopianLuxembourger
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.8%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%

Ethiopian vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 18.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-64 (82.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.29%).
Ethiopian vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricEthiopianLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
69.3%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
82.0%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.2%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.3%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.2%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.9%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.8%
Exceptional
85.0%

Ethiopian vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.8%), married-couple households (43.2% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 12.3%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (61.2% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 3.3%).
Ethiopian vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricEthiopianLuxembourger
Family Households
Tragic
61.2%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.2%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.5%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.5%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.8%
Exceptional
29.4%

Ethiopian vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 95.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 16.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 11.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.6%).
Ethiopian vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricEthiopianLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.1%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Excellent
6.6%

Ethiopian vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 52.8%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 21.3%), and master's degree (18.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 0.10%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.91%).
Ethiopian vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricEthiopianLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Poor
92.2%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Fair
89.0%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.0%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.3%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.9%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.4%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.8%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.0%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Excellent
1.9%

Ethiopian vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 21.3%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
Ethiopian vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricEthiopianLuxembourger
Disability
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Good
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.7%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Excellent
46.8%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%