Peruvian vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,322,377 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Peruvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.412. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Peruvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Peruvians corresponds to an increase of 10.9 Luxembourgers.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($56,052 compared to $50,379, a difference of 11.3%), wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.2%), and median household income ($90,261 compared to $86,418, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($47,628 compared to $47,640, a difference of 0.020%), median family income ($105,444 compared to $106,183, a difference of 0.70%), and median female earnings ($40,234 compared to $39,891, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 36.5%), receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 28.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and single female poverty (19.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 22.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 30.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 0.68%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.5%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and births to unmarried women (31.5% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.6% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 1.8%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 110.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 50.4%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 7.9%), and college, under 1 year (64.1% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (15.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.35%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.89%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Peruvian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 18.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 14.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.83%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.8%).