Immigrants from Oceania vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Oceania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Oceania

Luxembourgers

Average
Excellent
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,481,780 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.674. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 20.6 Luxembourgers.
Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Immigrants from Oceania vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.0%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $50,379, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $60,967, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($47,617 compared to $47,640, a difference of 0.050%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $103,536, a difference of 0.16%), and median family income ($106,453 compared to $106,183, a difference of 0.25%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricImmigrants from OceaniaLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,220
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,453
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,100
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,617
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,712
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,297
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,680
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,623
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,705
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,416
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.6%
Tragic
27.4%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 29.5%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 24.6%), and family poverty (8.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.58%), single female poverty (20.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 5.7%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from OceaniaLuxembourger
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Good
8.7%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Average
13.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.9%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
16.0%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Good
20.7%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Good
28.7%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.4%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.4%
Exceptional
9.1%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 20.0%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.4%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from OceaniaLuxembourger
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 19.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 3.1%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from OceaniaLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
37.9%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
85.0%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.0%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.10, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 2.6%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 3.9%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from OceaniaLuxembourger
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.6%
Exceptional
29.4%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 81.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 15.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 2.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 4.9%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from OceaniaLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.5%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.8%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Excellent
6.6%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 41.3%), associate's degree (45.8% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and bachelor's degree (37.3% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.70%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.71%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.72%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from OceaniaLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.9%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.8%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.5%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.6%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.3%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.7%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Excellent
1.9%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.5%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 13.4%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 1.9%), male disability (11.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.9%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from OceaniaLuxembourger
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Fair
11.4%
Good
11.1%
Females
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%