Hopi vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hopi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hopi

Luxembourgers

Poor
Excellent
1,478
SOCIAL INDEX
12.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
306th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Hopi Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,862,256 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Hopi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hopi within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.103% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hopi corresponds to an increase of 103.3 Luxembourgers.
Hopi Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Hopi vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hopi and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,177 compared to $45,663, a difference of 46.5%), median family income ($77,188 compared to $106,183, a difference of 37.6%), and wage/income gap (20.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($46,978 compared to $50,379, a difference of 7.2%), median female earnings ($33,932 compared to $39,891, a difference of 17.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,925 compared to $60,967, a difference of 19.7%).
Hopi vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricHopiLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$31,177
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,188
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Tragic
$65,043
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,871
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,060
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,932
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$46,978
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$75,002
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$75,562
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,925
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.0%
Tragic
27.4%

Hopi vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hopi and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 136.0%), family poverty (15.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 120.6%), and male poverty (20.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 118.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 20.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 35.2%), and single female poverty (28.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 37.1%).
Hopi vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricHopiLuxembourger
Poverty
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
27.1%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
27.9%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Tragic
27.5%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
28.0%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
9.1%

Hopi vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hopi and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (16.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 152.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (11.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 148.2%), and male unemployment (10.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 137.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 20.9%).
Hopi vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHopiLuxembourger
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
30.7%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.0%

Hopi vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hopi and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 42.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (66.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 19.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (58.4% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.3% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 13.3%).
Hopi vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHopiLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
58.4%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
71.7%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
66.0%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
76.5%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.3%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
77.0%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.0%
Exceptional
85.0%

Hopi vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hopi and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (50.8% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 72.7%), single mother households (8.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 52.5%), and currently married (36.5% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 3.1%), family households with children (25.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and average family size (3.60 compared to 3.10, a difference of 15.9%).
Hopi vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHopiLuxembourger
Family Households
Exceptional
65.3%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.2%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.60
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.5%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
50.8%
Exceptional
29.4%

Hopi vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hopi and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 156.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.0% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 20.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 15.0%).
Hopi vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHopiLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.4%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
49.0%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Excellent
6.6%

Hopi vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hopi and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (25.3% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 57.1%), associate's degree (34.6% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 41.6%), and master's degree (10.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.20%).
Hopi vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricHopiLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Good
97.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Good
97.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Good
95.9%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Fair
94.8%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.6%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.6%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.1%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.9%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
34.6%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
25.3%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.9%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Excellent
1.9%

Hopi vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hopi and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (4.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 251.5%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 50.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 9.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.3%).
Hopi vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricHopiLuxembourger
Disability
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
4.6%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.0%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.9%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.2%