Belizean vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Belizean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Belizeans

Luxembourgers

Tragic
Excellent
1,156
SOCIAL INDEX
9.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
320th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Belizean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,520,069 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Belizean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Belizeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.054% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Belizeans corresponds to an increase of 53.7 Luxembourgers.
Belizean Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Belizean vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Belizean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 29.2%), median family income ($90,880 compared to $106,183, a difference of 16.8%), and per capita income ($39,097 compared to $45,663, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,094 compared to $50,379, a difference of 1.4%), median female earnings ($37,429 compared to $39,891, a difference of 6.6%), and median earnings ($42,702 compared to $47,640, a difference of 11.6%).
Belizean vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricBelizeanLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,097
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,880
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Tragic
$77,028
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,702
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,358
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,429
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,094
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,534
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,684
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,580
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.2%
Tragic
27.4%

Belizean vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Belizean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 68.9%), receiving food stamps (14.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 62.4%), and family poverty (11.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 56.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.54%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and single father poverty (16.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 5.4%).
Belizean vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricBelizeanLuxembourger
Poverty
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
11.3%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.1%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.3%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
22.4%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Average
16.2%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.0%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
9.1%

Belizean vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Belizean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (6.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 47.0%), female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 44.6%), and male unemployment (6.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 9.3%).
Belizean vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBelizeanLuxembourger
Unemployment
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.0%

Belizean vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Belizean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.8% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 38.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 3.9%).
Belizean vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBelizeanLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.2%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
32.8%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.4%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.8%
Exceptional
85.0%

Belizean vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Belizean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 36.0%), births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 25.9%), and currently married (42.2% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 2.3%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 6.7%).
Belizean vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBelizeanLuxembourger
Family Households
Excellent
64.8%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.2%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.39
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.2%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.0%
Exceptional
29.4%

Belizean vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Belizean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 167.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.0% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 15.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (85.7% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 12.5%).
Belizean vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBelizeanLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
85.7%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.0%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Excellent
6.6%

Belizean vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Belizean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 89.1%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 39.0%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%).
Belizean vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricBelizeanLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.5%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.2%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.8%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
84.3%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.1%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.4%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.6%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.8%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.4%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Excellent
1.9%

Belizean vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Belizean and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.8%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 22.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.8% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability (11.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.3%).
Belizean vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricBelizeanLuxembourger
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Fair
11.4%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.8%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.4%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.2%