Inupiat vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Inupiat
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Inupiat

Luxembourgers

Fair
Excellent
2,695
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
244th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Inupiat Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,743,601 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Inupiat communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.883. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Inupiat within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.053% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Inupiat corresponds to an increase of 53.2 Luxembourgers.
Inupiat Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Inupiat vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 32.1%), per capita income ($36,999 compared to $45,663, a difference of 23.4%), and median male earnings ($47,281 compared to $56,300, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,061 compared to $60,967, a difference of 0.15%), median female earnings ($40,080 compared to $39,891, a difference of 0.47%), and median household income ($78,841 compared to $86,418, a difference of 9.6%).
Inupiat vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricInupiatLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,999
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,730
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,841
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,000
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,281
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,080
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,935
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,619
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,355
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,061
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.8%
Tragic
27.4%

Inupiat vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 119.6%), married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 84.2%), and family poverty (12.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 72.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 8.2%), and single female poverty (23.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 13.2%).
Inupiat vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricInupiatLuxembourger
Poverty
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.6%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Tragic
20.0%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
23.1%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.5%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Good
29.0%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
20.1%
Exceptional
9.1%

Inupiat vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (17.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 167.0%), male unemployment (12.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 166.2%), and unemployment (10.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 133.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (7.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 44.1%).
Inupiat vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricInupiatLuxembourger
Unemployment
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
28.1%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
5.0%

Inupiat vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 29.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.8% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.7% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 6.4%).
Inupiat vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricInupiatLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.1%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.0%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.6%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
79.8%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.7%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.9%
Exceptional
85.0%

Inupiat vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 117.9%), births to unmarried women (52.1% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 77.1%), and single mother households (8.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.69%), family households (67.8% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and married-couple households (42.4% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 14.3%).
Inupiat vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricInupiatLuxembourger
Family Households
Exceptional
67.8%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
32.8%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.4%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.63
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.3%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
52.1%
Exceptional
29.4%

Inupiat vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 457.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.6% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 38.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (71.5% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 23.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (71.5% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 32.5%).
Inupiat vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricInupiatLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
29.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
71.5%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
42.6%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Excellent
6.6%

Inupiat vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (25.8% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 54.0%), associate's degree (32.6% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 50.2%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (97.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.050%), 6th grade (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and 7th grade (97.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
Inupiat vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricInupiatLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Average
92.4%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
54.6%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.2%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
32.6%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
25.8%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.5%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Excellent
1.9%

Inupiat vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Inupiat and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (3.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 181.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (34.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 61.5%), and hearing disability (4.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.40%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and female disability (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.3%).
Inupiat vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricInupiatLuxembourger
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Good
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
58.4%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%