Asian vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,385,503 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Luxembourgers.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($101,681 compared to $86,418, a difference of 17.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $97,237, a difference of 15.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $103,536, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.8%), per capita income ($50,057 compared to $45,663, a difference of 9.6%), and median female earnings ($44,586 compared to $39,891, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 20.1%), single male poverty (11.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 19.2%), and single father poverty (14.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 1.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and female poverty (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.5%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.67%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 32.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 9.9%), family households with children (29.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.59%), currently married (48.4% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and married-couple households (49.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 67.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.59%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 51.0%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 25.4%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.88%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.89%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 21.3%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 18.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 0.080%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.3%).