Slavic vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,551,406 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.845. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.625% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 625.0 Luxembourgers.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,049 compared to $45,663, a difference of 1.4%), householder income over 65 years ($61,709 compared to $60,967, a difference of 1.2%), and median family income ($105,144 compared to $106,183, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($86,398 compared to $86,418, a difference of 0.020%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and median male earnings ($56,390 compared to $56,300, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 16.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 14.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.53%), single father poverty (17.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and single female poverty (21.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.51%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 7.7%), births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.77%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.83%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.10, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 67.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.88%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 3.9%), associate's degree (47.6% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and college, 1 year or more (60.6% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and 3rd grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.7%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 5.6%).