Pakistani vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pakistani
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pakistanis

Luxembourgers

Good
Excellent
8,084
SOCIAL INDEX
78.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
88th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Pakistani Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,843,389 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Pakistani communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.534. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pakistanis within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.114% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pakistanis corresponds to an increase of 113.7 Luxembourgers.
Pakistani Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Pakistani vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,325 compared to $50,379, a difference of 5.9%), wage/income gap (26.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,844 compared to $60,967, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,587 compared to $45,663, a difference of 0.17%), median male earnings ($56,719 compared to $56,300, a difference of 0.74%), and median family income ($107,390 compared to $106,183, a difference of 1.1%).
Pakistani vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricPakistaniLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,587
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,390
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,638
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,254
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,719
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,596
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,325
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$98,401
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$105,317
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,844
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.1%
Tragic
27.4%

Pakistani vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 22.0%), family poverty (8.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.4%), and receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.2%), single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 5.2%).
Pakistani vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricPakistaniLuxembourger
Poverty
Excellent
11.9%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.0%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.2%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.0%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
9.1%

Pakistani vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.9%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.7%).
Pakistani vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPakistaniLuxembourger
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%

Pakistani vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.6% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 20.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 2.4%).
Pakistani vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPakistaniLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.8%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.6%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.7%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.8%
Exceptional
85.0%

Pakistani vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.4%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and currently married (47.2% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 2.2%), married-couple households (47.3% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.1%).
Pakistani vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPakistaniLuxembourger
Family Households
Excellent
64.7%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Good
47.2%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Exceptional
29.4%

Pakistani vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 67.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.76%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 3.8%).
Pakistani vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPakistaniLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.3%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.9%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Excellent
6.6%

Pakistani vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 32.6%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (39.7% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 0.20%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.59%).
Pakistani vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricPakistaniLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Fair
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Average
97.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.4%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.5%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.5%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
48.1%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.7%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Excellent
15.8%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Excellent
1.9%

Pakistani vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.0%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 10.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.9%).
Pakistani vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricPakistaniLuxembourger
Disability
Average
11.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Fair
11.3%
Good
11.1%
Females
Excellent
12.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.2%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.7%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%