Brazilian vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Brazilian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Brazilians

Luxembourgers

Good
Excellent
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Brazilian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,125,169 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.666. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to an increase of 5.4 Luxembourgers.
Brazilian Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Brazilian vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,335 compared to $50,379, a difference of 7.9%), median household income ($88,934 compared to $86,418, a difference of 2.9%), and wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($106,942 compared to $106,183, a difference of 0.71%), householder income over 65 years ($61,465 compared to $60,967, a difference of 0.82%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,408 compared to $103,536, a difference of 0.84%).
Brazilian vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricBrazilianLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,700
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,942
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,934
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,356
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,837
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,483
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,335
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$98,267
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,408
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,465
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
27.4%

Brazilian vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 29.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 22.7%), and receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.80%), single female poverty (20.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.2%).
Brazilian vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricBrazilianLuxembourger
Poverty
Good
11.9%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Excellent
8.6%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Excellent
13.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.6%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.8%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.3%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.3%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.1%
Exceptional
9.1%

Brazilian vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 24.4%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 21.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 8.7%).
Brazilian vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBrazilianLuxembourger
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.7%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%

Brazilian vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 20.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.5%).
Brazilian vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBrazilianLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.6%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Exceptional
85.0%

Brazilian vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.4%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), family households (63.9% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.94%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.4%).
Brazilian vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBrazilianLuxembourger
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.2%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.2%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Exceptional
29.4%

Brazilian vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 93.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 19.8%).
Brazilian vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBrazilianLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.8%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.4%
Excellent
6.6%

Brazilian vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 29.8%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and master's degree (16.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (48.7% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.50%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.53%).
Brazilian vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricBrazilianLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Fair
96.0%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Average
94.9%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Good
93.8%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.3%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.5%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.7%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.5%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Excellent
1.9%

Brazilian vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.4%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 11.7%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.84%), and female disability (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.8%).
Brazilian vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricBrazilianLuxembourger
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Good
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%