Hawaiian vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hawaiian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hawaiians

Luxembourgers

Fair
Excellent
3,537
SOCIAL INDEX
32.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
218th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Hawaiian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,534,657 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.068. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 0.4 Luxembourgers.
Hawaiian Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Hawaiian vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,403 compared to $45,663, a difference of 15.9%), median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $56,300, a difference of 11.5%), and wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($84,729 compared to $86,418, a difference of 2.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,778 compared to $103,536, a difference of 4.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $50,379, a difference of 5.4%).
Hawaiian vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricHawaiianLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,403
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Poor
$98,869
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Average
$84,729
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,673
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,488
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,497
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$53,078
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$90,722
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,778
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,920
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
24.9%
Tragic
27.4%

Hawaiian vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 41.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 32.6%), and family poverty (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and single female poverty (21.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 3.6%).
Hawaiian vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricHawaiianLuxembourger
Poverty
Fair
12.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Average
9.0%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Fair
11.4%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Fair
13.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.7%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Poor
14.1%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Average
17.4%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.4%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.5%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Fair
21.2%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Average
29.2%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.1%

Hawaiian vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 26.5%), male unemployment (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 25.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 7.9%).
Hawaiian vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHawaiianLuxembourger
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%

Hawaiian vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 17.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 3.8%).
Hawaiian vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHawaiianLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.4%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.0%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.2%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.5%
Exceptional
85.0%

Hawaiian vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.2%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.7%), and births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.8% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 1.3%), currently married (46.6% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and family households with children (28.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 6.2%).
Hawaiian vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHawaiianLuxembourger
Family Households
Exceptional
67.4%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.41
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.2%
Exceptional
29.4%

Hawaiian vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 50.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 35.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 2.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 16.2%).
Hawaiian vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHawaiianLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.0%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.4%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
24.3%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.9%
Excellent
6.6%

Hawaiian vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 36.0%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 34.1%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.61%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.63%).
Hawaiian vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricHawaiianLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Fair
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Poor
95.8%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Poor
95.5%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Fair
94.7%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.8%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.6%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
85.0%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.1%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.6%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.9%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.6%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Excellent
1.9%

Hawaiian vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 19.4%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.7%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.67%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 6.8%).
Hawaiian vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricHawaiianLuxembourger
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.5%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.2%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%