Arab vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Arab
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Arabs

Luxembourgers

Average
Excellent
6,013
SOCIAL INDEX
57.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
166th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Arab Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,789,478 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Arab communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arabs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arabs corresponds to a decrease of 0.8 Luxembourgers.
Arab Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Arab vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arab and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.1%), median household income ($88,398 compared to $86,418, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,266 compared to $60,967, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,662 compared to $45,663, a difference of 0.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,336 compared to $97,237, a difference of 0.10%), and median family income ($106,952 compared to $106,183, a difference of 0.72%).
Arab vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricArabLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,662
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,952
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Excellent
$88,398
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,599
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,298
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,718
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,219
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,336
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,566
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$62,266
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.6%
Tragic
27.4%

Arab vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arab and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 45.8%), family poverty (9.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 27.9%), and receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother poverty (29.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Arab vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricArabLuxembourger
Poverty
Fair
12.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Fair
9.2%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Fair
13.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Poor
20.5%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.2%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Average
17.4%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Good
20.7%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Good
29.0%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
9.1%

Arab vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arab and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 23.3%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 22.3%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.7%).
Arab vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricArabLuxembourger
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Poor
11.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Average
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%

Arab vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arab and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 23.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 3.1%).
Arab vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricArabLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Good
65.2%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.2%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
36.8%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.6%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Poor
82.4%
Exceptional
85.0%

Arab vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arab and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.4%), currently married (47.0% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 0.83%), family households (64.1% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.1%).
Arab vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricArabLuxembourger
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.2%
Exceptional
29.4%

Arab vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arab and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 95.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 10.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 7.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 9.6%).
Arab vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricArabLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
55.0%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Excellent
6.6%

Arab vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arab and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 32.3%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.3%), and master's degree (16.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (49.0% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.60%).
Arab vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricArabLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Average
97.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Good
96.2%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Good
95.9%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Good
95.1%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.0%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.6%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.2%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.6%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.0%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.9%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.7%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Excellent
1.9%

Arab vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arab and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.7%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.72%), male disability (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.5%).
Arab vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricArabLuxembourger
Disability
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Good
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.8%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Average
3.0%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%