Cheyenne vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cheyenne
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cheyenne

Luxembourgers

Poor
Excellent
1,791
SOCIAL INDEX
15.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
287th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Cheyenne Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,674,129 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Cheyenne communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.732. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cheyenne within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.483% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cheyenne corresponds to an increase of 483.1 Luxembourgers.
Cheyenne Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Cheyenne vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($76,362 compared to $103,536, a difference of 35.6%), median family income ($81,385 compared to $106,183, a difference of 30.5%), and per capita income ($35,276 compared to $45,663, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,275 compared to $50,379, a difference of 11.3%), median female earnings ($35,673 compared to $39,891, a difference of 11.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,096 compared to $60,967, a difference of 12.7%).
Cheyenne vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricCheyenneLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,276
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Tragic
$81,385
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Tragic
$66,974
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,233
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,062
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,673
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,275
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$79,152
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$76,362
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,096
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.3%
Tragic
27.4%

Cheyenne vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 143.3%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 97.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (28.3% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 90.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.4%), single male poverty (16.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 20.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 34.9%).
Cheyenne vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricCheyenneLuxembourger
Poverty
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.1%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
28.3%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
25.8%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
30.4%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.5%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
9.1%

Cheyenne vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (10.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 150.0%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 115.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (16.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 97.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 12.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.4%).
Cheyenne vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCheyenneLuxembourger
Unemployment
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.3%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.8%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
5.0%

Cheyenne vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 19.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (74.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.1% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.0% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 7.7%).
Cheyenne vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCheyenneLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.0%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
74.8%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
37.9%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.4%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.3%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.1%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.5%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.6%
Exceptional
85.0%

Cheyenne vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 45.5%), births to unmarried women (41.3% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 40.5%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.2% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.19%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.47 compared to 3.10, a difference of 12.0%).
Cheyenne vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCheyenneLuxembourger
Family Households
Tragic
63.2%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.3%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.47
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.2%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
41.3%
Exceptional
29.4%

Cheyenne vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 118.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 25.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 6.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 8.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 8.7%).
Cheyenne vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCheyenneLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.3%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.3%
Excellent
6.6%

Cheyenne vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 36.7%), bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 35.0%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.13%).
Cheyenne vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricCheyenneLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Average
94.9%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.6%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.7%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.6%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.1%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.7%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.2%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Excellent
1.9%

Cheyenne vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 59.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (31.1% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 45.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 8.5%), female disability (13.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 12.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 13.0%).
Cheyenne vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricCheyenneLuxembourger
Disability
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
31.1%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.9%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%