Immigrants from Lithuania vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Lithuania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Lithuania

Luxembourgers

Exceptional
Excellent
9,656
SOCIAL INDEX
94.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
10th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Immigrants from Lithuania Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,443,041 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.188. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to an increase of 15.0 Luxembourgers.
Immigrants from Lithuania Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($63,346 compared to $56,300, a difference of 12.5%), per capita income ($51,361 compared to $45,663, a difference of 12.5%), and median household income ($96,836 compared to $86,418, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.3%), householder income over 65 years ($66,087 compared to $60,967, a difference of 8.4%), and median female earnings ($43,317 compared to $39,891, a difference of 8.6%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,361
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$118,053
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$96,836
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,769
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,346
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,317
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,028
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,149
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$114,336
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,087
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.6%
Tragic
27.4%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 19.9%), single male poverty (11.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.1%), and single female poverty (17.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.010%), male poverty (9.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaLuxembourger
Poverty
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.4%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.9%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.1%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.8%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.2%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.1%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 16.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.90%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.3%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaLuxembourger
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 21.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.90%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.2%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Exceptional
85.0%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.3%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.6% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.23%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.87%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaLuxembourger
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.6%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Exceptional
29.4%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 83.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 13.1%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.8%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
6.6%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 20.8%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 20.5%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.6% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.18%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.1%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.4%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.6%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.5%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.6%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Excellent
1.9%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 18.3%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (44.9% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 0.090%), ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.79%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 0.98%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaLuxembourger
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Good
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.5%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.9%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.0%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%