Marshallese vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Marshallese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Marshallese

Luxembourgers

Fair
Excellent
2,873
SOCIAL INDEX
26.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
240th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Marshallese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 9,704,272 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Marshallese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.779. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Marshallese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Marshallese corresponds to an increase of 14.8 Luxembourgers.
Marshallese Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Marshallese vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 17.1%), median male earnings ($48,137 compared to $56,300, a difference of 17.0%), and per capita income ($39,108 compared to $45,663, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,627 compared to $50,379, a difference of 0.49%), householder income over 65 years ($65,874 compared to $60,967, a difference of 8.1%), and median female earnings ($36,459 compared to $39,891, a difference of 9.4%).
Marshallese vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricMarshalleseLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,108
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,293
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,930
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,969
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,137
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,459
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,627
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,575
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,455
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,874
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.4%
Tragic
27.4%

Marshallese vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 54.2%), family poverty (9.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 37.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.26%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.63%), and single father poverty (16.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Marshallese vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricMarshalleseLuxembourger
Poverty
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
9.9%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
23.3%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.1%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Average
5.2%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
9.1%

Marshallese vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 50.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 44.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 5.9%).
Marshallese vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricMarshalleseLuxembourger
Unemployment
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Poor
11.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
3.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%

Marshallese vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.5% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.3% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 4.3%).
Marshallese vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricMarshalleseLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.2%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.3%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.5%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.3%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.2%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.4%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.3%
Exceptional
85.0%

Marshallese vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.8% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 18.1%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.72%), family households with children (26.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.7%).
Marshallese vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricMarshalleseLuxembourger
Family Households
Tragic
63.7%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.2%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.6%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.38
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.5%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
29.4%

Marshallese vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 83.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.9% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 2.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.9% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 7.6%).
Marshallese vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricMarshalleseLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.9%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.3%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Excellent
6.6%

Marshallese vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 32.8%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 32.6%), and bachelor's degree (31.7% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.43%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.44%).
Marshallese vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricMarshalleseLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
2.0%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Good
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Fair
94.7%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.7%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.6%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.9%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.8%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.6%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.7%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.6%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Excellent
1.9%

Marshallese vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Marshallese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 40.6%), ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 24.3%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 3.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 8.2%).
Marshallese vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricMarshalleseLuxembourger
Disability
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.94%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.1%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%