Fijian vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,519,269 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 4.2 Luxembourgers.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,690 compared to $45,663, a difference of 24.5%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $56,300, a difference of 23.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $97,237, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $50,379, a difference of 0.49%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $60,967, a difference of 7.4%), and median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $39,891, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 48.9%), receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 42.5%), and family poverty (10.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 3.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 39.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 25.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.6%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.4%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 4.2%), married-couple households (46.1% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 77.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 2.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 71.6%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 57.7%), and no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 56.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.97%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.97%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 26.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 25.0%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 8.0%).