Comanche vs Luxembourger Community Comparison
COMPARE
Comanche
Luxembourger
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Comanche
Luxembourgers
1,908
SOCIAL INDEX
16.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
283rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Luxembourger Integration in Comanche Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,243,019 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.952. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.742% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 741.9 Luxembourgers.
Comanche vs Luxembourger Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $103,536, a difference of 20.7%), median family income ($88,556 compared to $106,183, a difference of 19.9%), and per capita income ($38,088 compared to $45,663, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $50,379, a difference of 6.0%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $60,967, a difference of 11.0%).
Income Metric | Comanche | Luxembourger |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,088 | Exceptional $45,663 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,556 | Excellent $106,183 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $73,747 | Good $86,418 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,519 | Excellent $47,640 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,202 | Excellent $56,300 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,661 | Average $39,891 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,518 | Tragic $50,379 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,152 | Excellent $97,237 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $85,787 | Excellent $103,536 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,922 | Average $60,967 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Tragic 27.4% |
Comanche vs Luxembourger Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 54.1%), family poverty (11.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 53.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 8.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 13.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 18.8%).
Poverty Metric | Comanche | Luxembourger |
Poverty | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Families | Tragic 11.0% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 20.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.1% | Exceptional 13.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.0% | Tragic 13.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.6% | Excellent 20.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.9% | Excellent 28.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Comanche vs Luxembourger Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 34.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 30.3%), and male unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Comanche | Luxembourger |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Males | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Poor 11.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Comanche vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 20.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 4.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Comanche | Luxembourger |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.6% | Exceptional 66.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.0% | Exceptional 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.7% | Exceptional 45.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.4% | Exceptional 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 86.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Exceptional 86.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.5% | Exceptional 86.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.2% | Exceptional 85.0% |
Comanche vs Luxembourger Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.5%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 24.8%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.29%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.10, a difference of 4.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Comanche | Luxembourger |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Tragic 63.3% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.5% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Tragic 3.10 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Exceptional 49.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Exceptional 29.4% |
Comanche vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 91.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.46%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 4.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Comanche | Luxembourger |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 5.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 89.9% | Exceptional 94.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.5% | Exceptional 59.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Exceptional 20.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Excellent 6.6% |
Comanche vs Luxembourger Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 30.6%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 29.7%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.49%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.50%).
Education Level Metric | Comanche | Luxembourger |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.1% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Fair 97.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.8% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Poor 95.5% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.6% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Exceptional 95.4% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Exceptional 94.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.9% | Exceptional 93.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Exceptional 91.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.6% | Exceptional 88.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.4% | Exceptional 68.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.4% | Exceptional 62.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 39.9% | Exceptional 48.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.9% | Excellent 39.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.1% | Good 15.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Good 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Excellent 1.9% |
Comanche vs Luxembourger Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 46.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 39.4%), and ambulatory disability (7.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 6.0%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 13.7%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 15.3%).
Disability Metric | Comanche | Luxembourger |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.3% | Exceptional 21.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.7% | Exceptional 44.8% |
Vision | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.2% |