Portuguese vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,118,958 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.534. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to an increase of 18.3 Luxembourgers.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,436 compared to $50,379, a difference of 8.1%), median household income ($88,976 compared to $86,418, a difference of 3.0%), and per capita income ($44,362 compared to $45,663, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($106,286 compared to $106,183, a difference of 0.10%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and median male earnings ($56,663 compared to $56,300, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 33.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 18.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.39%), single mother poverty (28.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and single male poverty (12.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 35.3%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 9.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 14.9%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.8%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.8% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.10, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 60.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 0.74%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 32.8%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 13.6%), and bachelor's degree (35.5% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 22.7%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.5%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 6.7%).