Polish vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Polish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Poles

Luxembourgers

Excellent
Excellent
8,413
SOCIAL INDEX
81.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
72nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Polish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,538,206 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Polish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Poles within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Poles corresponds to an increase of 3.6 Luxembourgers.
Polish Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Polish vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Polish and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,407 compared to $50,379, a difference of 4.0%), and median male earnings ($58,139 compared to $56,300, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($46,123 compared to $45,663, a difference of 1.0%), householder income over 65 years ($61,598 compared to $60,967, a difference of 1.0%), and median female earnings ($40,371 compared to $39,891, a difference of 1.2%).
Polish vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricPolishLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,123
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,507
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Excellent
$88,472
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,659
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$58,139
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,371
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,407
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,685
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$105,952
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,598
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.5%
Tragic
27.4%

Polish vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Polish and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 11.2%), receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.53%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.93%), and female poverty (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
Polish vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricPolishLuxembourger
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.8%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.7%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.0%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Poor
13.0%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.0%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.3%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.4%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.1%

Polish vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Polish and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 34.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.4%).
Polish vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPolishLuxembourger
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.3%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%

Polish vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Polish and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.1% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Polish vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPolishLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
42.1%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.6%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.8%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Exceptional
85.0%

Polish vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Polish and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.0%), births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.14%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and average family size (3.09 compared to 3.10, a difference of 0.32%).
Polish vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPolishLuxembourger
Family Households
Poor
64.0%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.5%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.09
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.8%
Exceptional
29.4%

Polish vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Polish and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 57.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 1.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 3.4%).
Polish vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPolishLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.7%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.3%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.2%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.4%
Excellent
6.6%

Polish vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Polish and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 10.5%), master's degree (15.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and college, 1 year or more (60.7% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%).
Polish vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricPolishLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.5%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.9%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.5%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.9%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.7%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
48.0%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
39.1%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Excellent
15.7%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Excellent
1.9%

Polish vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Polish and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 20.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.050%), disability age over 75 (45.3% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 3.1%).
Polish vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricPolishLuxembourger
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.3%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%