Slovak vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,241,369 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Slovak communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.430. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slovaks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slovaks corresponds to an increase of 13.3 Luxembourgers.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slovak and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.3%), householder income over 65 years ($59,039 compared to $60,967, a difference of 3.3%), and per capita income ($44,229 compared to $45,663, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,306 compared to $56,300, a difference of 0.010%), median earnings ($47,095 compared to $47,640, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,753 compared to $50,379, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slovak and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 18.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 18.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.72%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and single female poverty (21.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slovak and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 35.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slovak and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.6% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slovak and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 13.4%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and family households with children (25.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.050%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and average family size (3.06 compared to 3.10, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slovak and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 54.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 1.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slovak and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 18.3%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.6% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slovak and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 29.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.7%), and ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.31%), disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 5.3%).