Immigrants from Ecuador vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Ecuador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Ecuador

Luxembourgers

Poor
Excellent
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,619,974 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.212. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 5.2 Luxembourgers.
Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 22.0%), median family income ($92,837 compared to $106,183, a difference of 14.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,462 compared to $103,536, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $39,891, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $50,379, a difference of 6.6%), and median earnings ($44,462 compared to $47,640, a difference of 7.1%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricImmigrants from EcuadorLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,195
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Tragic
$92,837
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,341
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,462
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,474
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,644
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,722
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,673
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,462
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,030
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.5%
Tragic
27.4%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 74.0%), receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 64.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 56.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 4.9%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and single female poverty (22.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 7.8%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from EcuadorLuxembourger
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
22.0%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.3%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
9.1%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 44.9%), unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 43.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 16.3%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from EcuadorLuxembourger
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.5%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.0%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 46.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from EcuadorLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.3%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.2%
Exceptional
85.0%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 32.1%), births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 14.7%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 2.4%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.3%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from EcuadorLuxembourger
Family Households
Exceptional
64.8%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.9%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.7%
Exceptional
29.4%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 344.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 56.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 55.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 24.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 45.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 55.8%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from EcuadorLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
23.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
40.5%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.2%
Excellent
6.6%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 94.2%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 37.5%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from EcuadorLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.7%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.3%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.1%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.5%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
84.8%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.0%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
58.7%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.2%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.7%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.6%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Excellent
1.9%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 31.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 19.5%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.1%), disability (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.1%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from EcuadorLuxembourger
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Good
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.7%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%