Nepalese vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Nepalese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Nepalese

Luxembourgers

Poor
Excellent
1,939
SOCIAL INDEX
16.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
281st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Nepalese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,112,278 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Nepalese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.646. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nepalese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.048% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nepalese corresponds to an increase of 47.9 Luxembourgers.
Nepalese Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Nepalese vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 23.5%), per capita income ($38,442 compared to $45,663, a difference of 18.8%), and median male earnings ($49,458 compared to $56,300, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,603 compared to $39,891, a difference of 3.3%), householder income over 65 years ($58,761 compared to $60,967, a difference of 3.7%), and median household income ($82,410 compared to $86,418, a difference of 4.9%).
Nepalese vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricNepaleseLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,442
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,153
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,410
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,860
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,458
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,603
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,472
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,498
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,355
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,761
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
27.4%

Nepalese vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 68.4%), receiving food stamps (14.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 59.9%), and family poverty (10.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and single female poverty (21.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 6.3%).
Nepalese vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricNepaleseLuxembourger
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
10.4%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.2%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
21.7%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.3%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
9.1%

Nepalese vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 42.3%), male unemployment (6.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 41.9%), and female unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
Nepalese vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNepaleseLuxembourger
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.7%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.0%

Nepalese vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.5% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 35.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.7% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 4.8%).
Nepalese vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNepaleseLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.5%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.7%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.4%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.5%
Exceptional
85.0%

Nepalese vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 39.8%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 34.1%), and births to unmarried women (33.5% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.2% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 6.2%), married-couple households (45.6% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 9.9%).
Nepalese vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNepaleseLuxembourger
Family Households
Exceptional
67.2%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
30.5%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.6%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.42
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.7%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.5%
Exceptional
29.4%

Nepalese vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 38.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 32.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.6% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 19.4%).
Nepalese vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNepaleseLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.4%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
24.9%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Excellent
6.6%

Nepalese vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 139.7%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 54.5%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.4%), kindergarten (96.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and 1st grade (96.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.4%).
Nepalese vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricNepaleseLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
92.8%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.0%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.7%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.5%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.1%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.3%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.2%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.9%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
39.0%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.9%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.5%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Excellent
1.9%

Nepalese vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.97% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 35.3%), self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.63%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 3.7%).
Nepalese vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricNepaleseLuxembourger
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.97%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.0%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.2%