Maltese vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,095,676 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Maltese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.687. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Maltese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.650% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Maltese corresponds to an increase of 649.6 Luxembourgers.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Maltese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,064 compared to $97,237, a difference of 13.2%), median household income ($97,015 compared to $86,418, a difference of 12.3%), and median male earnings ($62,953 compared to $56,300, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,735 compared to $50,379, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,027 compared to $60,967, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Maltese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 18.8%), single male poverty (11.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 18.6%), and single female poverty (18.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and receiving food stamps (8.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Maltese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 22.5%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Maltese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 17.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Maltese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.9%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and births to unmarried women (27.8% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.0% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 0.55%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (49.2% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Maltese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 70.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.45%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Maltese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 12.5%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.5% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.0%), ged/equivalency (88.6% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.010%), and 9th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Maltese and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.9%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and female disability (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.31%), male disability (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.68%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.74%).