Belgian vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Belgian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Belgians

Luxembourgers

Good
Excellent
7,372
SOCIAL INDEX
71.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
120th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Belgian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,104,396 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Belgian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Belgians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Belgians corresponds to an increase of 1.6 Luxembourgers.
Belgian Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Belgian vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Belgian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.9%), median female earnings ($38,382 compared to $39,891, a difference of 3.9%), and per capita income ($43,951 compared to $45,663, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,113 compared to $50,379, a difference of 0.53%), median male earnings ($55,361 compared to $56,300, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,915 compared to $60,967, a difference of 1.8%).
Belgian vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricBelgianLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,951
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Average
$102,788
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Fair
$84,008
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Average
$46,375
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,361
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,382
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,113
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$94,262
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$100,060
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Fair
$59,915
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.8%
Tragic
27.4%

Belgian vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Belgian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 11.9%), receiving food stamps (10.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.4%), single father poverty (16.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.0%).
Belgian vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricBelgianLuxembourger
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.9%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.4%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.7%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Poor
21.5%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
9.1%

Belgian vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Belgian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 28.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.89%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.0%).
Belgian vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBelgianLuxembourger
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.9%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.6%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%

Belgian vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Belgian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.4% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 1.7%).
Belgian vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBelgianLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.7%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.4%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.8%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.5%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.9%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
85.0%

Belgian vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Belgian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.3%), births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.10, a difference of 0.14%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.57%), and family households (63.8% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.75%).
Belgian vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBelgianLuxembourger
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.0%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.7%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.6%
Exceptional
29.4%

Belgian vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Belgian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 49.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 0.34%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.2%).
Belgian vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBelgianLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.2%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Excellent
6.6%

Belgian vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Belgian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 7.3%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.0%), 4th grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.0%), and 6th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.0%).
Belgian vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricBelgianLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.9%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.7%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Good
66.2%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.7%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.3%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.5%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Excellent
1.9%

Belgian vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Belgian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 10.6%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 6.3%).
Belgian vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricBelgianLuxembourger
Disability
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.7%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.8%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%