Tsimshian vs Luxembourger Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Luxembourger
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tsimshian
Luxembourgers
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Luxembourger Integration in Tsimshian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 10,742,175 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to an increase of 2.7 Luxembourgers.
Tsimshian vs Luxembourger Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $56,300, a difference of 15.3%), wage/income gap (23.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 14.9%), and per capita income ($40,344 compared to $45,663, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $97,237, a difference of 0.59%), median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $39,891, a difference of 0.91%), and median household income ($83,346 compared to $86,418, a difference of 3.7%).
Income Metric | Tsimshian | Luxembourger |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,344 | Exceptional $45,663 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,543 | Excellent $106,183 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,346 | Good $86,418 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,695 | Excellent $47,640 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,836 | Excellent $56,300 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,530 | Average $39,891 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,649 | Tragic $50,379 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,809 | Excellent $97,237 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,783 | Excellent $103,536 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,202 | Average $60,967 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.9% | Tragic 27.4% |
Tsimshian vs Luxembourger Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 72.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 52.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 3.3%).
Poverty Metric | Tsimshian | Luxembourger |
Poverty | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Tragic 20.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Exceptional 13.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 13.4% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Excellent 20.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 17.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.8% | Excellent 28.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Tsimshian vs Luxembourger Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 186.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 97.2%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 86.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 5.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Tsimshian | Luxembourger |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Males | Tragic 8.5% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.5% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Tsimshian vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 21.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 3.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tsimshian | Luxembourger |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.5% | Exceptional 66.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Exceptional 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.4% | Exceptional 45.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Exceptional 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 88.7% | Exceptional 86.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Exceptional 86.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Exceptional 86.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.4% | Exceptional 85.0% |
Tsimshian vs Luxembourger Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 43.2%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 29.5%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.11%), married-couple households (48.7% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and currently married (47.7% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 3.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Tsimshian | Luxembourger |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 63.3% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Tragic 3.10 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.7% | Exceptional 49.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.2% | Exceptional 29.4% |
Tsimshian vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 60.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 9.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tsimshian | Luxembourger |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 5.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Exceptional 94.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Exceptional 59.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Exceptional 20.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Excellent 6.6% |
Tsimshian vs Luxembourger Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 45.1%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 38.3%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.4% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.060%), 10th grade (95.6% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and 5th grade (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.35%).
Education Level Metric | Tsimshian | Luxembourger |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 95.4% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Exceptional 94.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Exceptional 93.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Exceptional 91.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Exceptional 88.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.3% | Exceptional 68.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.9% | Exceptional 62.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 48.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Excellent 39.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Good 15.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Good 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Excellent 1.9% |
Tsimshian vs Luxembourger Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 83.0%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 65.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 58.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 5.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 7.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.9%).
Disability Metric | Tsimshian | Luxembourger |
Disability | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Males | Tragic 15.6% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.9% | Exceptional 21.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 59.2% | Exceptional 44.8% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.8% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |