Immigrants from Laos vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Laos
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Laos

Luxembourgers

Fair
Excellent
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Immigrants from Laos Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,610,693 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.442. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.054% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 53.9 Luxembourgers.
Immigrants from Laos Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Immigrants from Laos vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,857 compared to $45,663, a difference of 20.6%), wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 15.1%), and median family income ($92,239 compared to $106,183, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $50,379, a difference of 0.68%), householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $60,967, a difference of 7.5%), and median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $39,891, a difference of 8.3%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricImmigrants from LaosLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,857
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Tragic
$92,239
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,327
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,884
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,190
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,841
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,041
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$85,553
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,909
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,722
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.8%
Tragic
27.4%

Immigrants from Laos vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 50.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 46.6%), and family poverty (10.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 1.1%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 7.2%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from LaosLuxembourger
Poverty
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.6%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
22.9%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
9.1%

Immigrants from Laos vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 22.7%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.0%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.9%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from LaosLuxembourger
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.1%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.6%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%

Immigrants from Laos vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from LaosLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.6%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
85.0%

Immigrants from Laos vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 37.9%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.2%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 3.2%), married-couple households (45.1% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 7.4%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.10, a difference of 7.6%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from LaosLuxembourger
Family Households
Exceptional
65.3%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.8%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.1%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.34
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.0%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.0%
Exceptional
29.4%

Immigrants from Laos vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 52.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 0.19%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 7.2%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from LaosLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.8%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.2%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.4%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Excellent
6.6%

Immigrants from Laos vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 98.3%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 42.3%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from LaosLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.6%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.7%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.3%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.7%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.6%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Excellent
1.9%

Immigrants from Laos vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 22.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 22.2%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 5.4%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from LaosLuxembourger
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.1%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.2%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.2%