Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Nicaragua
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Nicaragua

Luxembourgers

Fair
Excellent
3,407
SOCIAL INDEX
31.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
221st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Immigrants from Nicaragua Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,179,674 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Immigrant from Nicaragua communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.557. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nicaragua within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.063% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nicaragua corresponds to an increase of 63.2 Luxembourgers.
Immigrants from Nicaragua Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($88,267 compared to $106,183, a difference of 20.3%), per capita income ($38,065 compared to $45,663, a difference of 20.0%), and wage/income gap (23.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,266 compared to $50,379, a difference of 5.7%), median female earnings ($36,023 compared to $39,891, a difference of 10.7%), and median household income ($76,784 compared to $86,418, a difference of 12.6%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,065
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,267
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,784
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,737
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,482
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,023
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,266
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,914
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$89,108
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,085
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
27.4%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 88.8%), married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 82.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 72.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.8%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 6.3%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaLuxembourger
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.9%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Good
16.2%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
9.1%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.7%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 3.1%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaLuxembourger
Unemployment
Average
5.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.0%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.6% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 43.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.9%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.1%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.7%
Exceptional
85.0%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 33.7%), births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 29.0%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.2%), family households (67.5% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.10, a difference of 8.6%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaLuxembourger
Family Households
Exceptional
67.5%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.5%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.37
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.7%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.0%
Exceptional
29.4%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 85.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 5.2%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Good
9.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.4%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.2%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Excellent
6.6%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 93.5%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 42.5%), and master's degree (11.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.0%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.3%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
89.5%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.1%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
86.6%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
79.9%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.6%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.4%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.3%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.9%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.8%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Excellent
1.9%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 21.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 20.9%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.54%), disability (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.80%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaLuxembourger
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Good
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.1%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.2%