Houma vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,018,801 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.277. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.074% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to a decrease of 73.9 Luxembourgers.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $103,536, a difference of 43.6%), wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 40.9%), and median family income ($76,188 compared to $106,183, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $56,300, a difference of 11.4%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $50,379, a difference of 13.6%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $47,640, a difference of 22.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (14.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 102.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (26.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 89.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 88.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 25.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 50.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 50.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 81.9%), male unemployment (7.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 56.7%), and unemployment (6.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 27.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 14.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.9% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 58.2%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 42.6%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.10, a difference of 2.5%), family households (65.7% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 114.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 34.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 6.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 30.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 108.3%), doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 102.2%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 93.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 77.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 76.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 71.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 17.6%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 25.3%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 30.6%).