Lumbee vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,457,196 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.280% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to an increase of 280.1 Luxembourgers.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $97,237, a difference of 61.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($65,113 compared to $103,536, a difference of 59.0%), and median household income ($54,644 compared to $86,418, a difference of 58.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $39,891, a difference of 22.7%), wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 28.6%), and median earnings ($36,876 compared to $47,640, a difference of 29.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (22.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 150.9%), family poverty (17.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 135.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (31.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 131.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 48.8%), single mother poverty (43.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 51.6%), and single female poverty (33.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 61.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 108.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 80.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 75.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 46.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 20.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.3% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 12.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 63.8%), single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 63.7%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.1% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.36%), family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.10, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 93.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 32.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 87.5%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 77.8%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 65.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.010%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 74.6%), ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 70.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (17.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 66.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 8.5%), and cognitive disability (19.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 16.8%).