Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Trinidadians and Tobagonians

Luxembourgers

Poor
Excellent
1,572
SOCIAL INDEX
13.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
298th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Trinidadian and Tobagonian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,432,123 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.485. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Trinidadians and Tobagonians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Trinidadians and Tobagonians corresponds to an increase of 17.3 Luxembourgers.
Trinidadian and Tobagonian Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 41.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,357 compared to $103,536, a difference of 13.3%), and median family income ($94,466 compared to $106,183, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,958 compared to $39,891, a difference of 2.7%), median earnings ($45,820 compared to $47,640, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,631 compared to $50,379, a difference of 4.5%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,655
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,466
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,402
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,820
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,446
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,958
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,631
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,856
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,357
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,327
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
19.3%
Tragic
27.4%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 74.9%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 60.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.32%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and single female poverty (21.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 3.7%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianLuxembourger
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Fair
21.2%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.6%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.0%
Exceptional
9.1%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 50.2%), male unemployment (6.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 47.3%), and unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 10.0%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianLuxembourger
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.6%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Poor
9.1%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.0%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.9% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 46.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 10.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 2.6%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.5%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.5%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.0%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 38.8%), births to unmarried women (36.5% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 23.9%), and married-couple households (40.9% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.53%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.6%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianLuxembourger
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.9%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.5%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.5%
Exceptional
29.4%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 343.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 55.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 53.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.3% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 24.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.9% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 44.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 53.3%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
76.3%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
40.9%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.3%
Excellent
6.6%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 63.6%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.7%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.7%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.4%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.9%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.1%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.8%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.7%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Excellent
1.9%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 29.9%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.6%), disability (11.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 6.4%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianLuxembourger
Disability
Average
11.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Good
11.1%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Poor
5.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
23.9%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.7%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.2%