Kiowa vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Kiowa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Kiowa

Luxembourgers

Poor
Excellent
2,045
SOCIAL INDEX
18.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
274th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Kiowa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,951,116 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Kiowa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.882. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kiowa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.276% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Kiowa corresponds to an increase of 275.9 Luxembourgers.
Kiowa Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Kiowa vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,815 compared to $103,536, a difference of 38.4%), median family income ($80,885 compared to $106,183, a difference of 31.3%), and median household income ($65,914 compared to $86,418, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,733 compared to $50,379, a difference of 12.6%), wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 16.2%), and median female earnings ($34,074 compared to $39,891, a difference of 17.1%).
Kiowa vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricKiowaLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,102
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Tragic
$80,885
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Tragic
$65,914
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,232
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,094
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,074
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,733
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$74,776
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$74,815
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,140
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.6%
Tragic
27.4%

Kiowa vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 71.4%), family poverty (12.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 69.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (23.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 66.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 14.2%), single mother poverty (35.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 24.3%), and single father poverty (22.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 31.4%).
Kiowa vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricKiowaLuxembourger
Poverty
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
29.2%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.2%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
26.9%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.5%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.3%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
9.1%

Kiowa vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 67.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 44.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Kiowa vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricKiowaLuxembourger
Unemployment
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
25.2%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%

Kiowa vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 21.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.2% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.4% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.9%).
Kiowa vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricKiowaLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.4%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.0%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.2%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.2%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.8%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.2%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.3%
Exceptional
85.0%

Kiowa vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.1% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 46.6%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 28.4%), and divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.89%), family households (61.4% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.10, a difference of 5.4%).
Kiowa vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricKiowaLuxembourger
Family Households
Tragic
61.4%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.0%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
43.1%
Exceptional
29.4%

Kiowa vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 115.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 7.0%).
Kiowa vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricKiowaLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.6%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.5%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Excellent
6.6%

Kiowa vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 49.7%), master's degree (10.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 41.7%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%).
Kiowa vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricKiowaLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.2%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.8%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.0%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.5%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.8%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Excellent
1.9%

Kiowa vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 67.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (17.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 64.1%), and ambulatory disability (8.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.1%), cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 14.3%), and disability age over 75 (54.2% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 21.0%).
Kiowa vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricKiowaLuxembourger
Disability
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.6%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.2%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.2%