Subsaharan African vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Subsaharan African
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Sub-Saharan Africans

Luxembourgers

Tragic
Excellent
977
SOCIAL INDEX
7.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
330th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Subsaharan African Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,112,441 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.352. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to an increase of 2.6 Luxembourgers.
Subsaharan African Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Subsaharan African vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 20.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,235 compared to $97,237, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,691 compared to $103,536, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,691 compared to $50,379, a difference of 3.5%), median female earnings ($38,391 compared to $39,891, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,615 compared to $60,967, a difference of 7.7%).
Subsaharan African vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricSubsaharan AfricanLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,152
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Tragic
$93,748
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Tragic
$77,631
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,118
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,408
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,391
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,691
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,235
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,691
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,615
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.8%
Tragic
27.4%

Subsaharan African vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 54.2%), family poverty (10.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 50.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.0%), single male poverty (13.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.0% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 5.5%).
Subsaharan African vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricSubsaharan AfricanLuxembourger
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.0%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.1%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
23.2%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.4%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
9.1%

Subsaharan African vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 33.5%), male unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 31.4%), and female unemployment (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.2%).
Subsaharan African vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSubsaharan AfricanLuxembourger
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.0%

Subsaharan African vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 17.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 0.79%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 2.8%).
Subsaharan African vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSubsaharan AfricanLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.4%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.7%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.3%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.5%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.1%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Exceptional
85.0%

Subsaharan African vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 40.4%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 24.6%), and married-couple households (41.6% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.10, a difference of 4.8%).
Subsaharan African vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSubsaharan AfricanLuxembourger
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.6%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.6%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
29.4%

Subsaharan African vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 127.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 16.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 7.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 13.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.0%).
Subsaharan African vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSubsaharan AfricanLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
87.9%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.9%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
6.6%

Subsaharan African vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 44.9%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.6%), and associate's degree (43.9% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.80%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.81%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.81%).
Subsaharan African vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricSubsaharan AfricanLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.2%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.3%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.9%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.8%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.2%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Excellent
1.9%

Subsaharan African vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 21.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 19.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.73%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and male disability (11.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 5.6%).
Subsaharan African vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricSubsaharan AfricanLuxembourger
Disability
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.1%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%