Shoshone vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Shoshone
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Shoshone

Luxembourgers

Fair
Excellent
2,256
SOCIAL INDEX
20.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
264th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Shoshone Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,443,662 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Shoshone communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.794. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Shoshone within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.057% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Shoshone corresponds to an increase of 56.5 Luxembourgers.
Shoshone Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Shoshone vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,588 compared to $103,536, a difference of 23.9%), per capita income ($37,072 compared to $45,663, a difference of 23.2%), and median family income ($87,872 compared to $106,183, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,720 compared to $50,379, a difference of 3.4%), wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,681 compared to $60,967, a difference of 13.6%).
Shoshone vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricShoshoneLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,072
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,872
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,660
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,932
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,930
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,677
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,720
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,062
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,588
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,681
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.4%
Tragic
27.4%

Shoshone vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 57.3%), family poverty (10.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 51.0%), and male poverty (13.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 7.9%), single mother poverty (32.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 15.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 21.1%).
Shoshone vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricShoshoneLuxembourger
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.0%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
25.1%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.9%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
9.1%

Shoshone vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 98.9%), male unemployment (7.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 67.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 64.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 20.2%).
Shoshone vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricShoshoneLuxembourger
Unemployment
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.0%

Shoshone vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.3% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.2% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 5.5%).
Shoshone vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricShoshoneLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.8%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.3%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.2%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.3%
Exceptional
85.0%

Shoshone vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 23.7%), single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.3%), and births to unmarried women (35.3% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.83%), family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.10, a difference of 8.7%).
Shoshone vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricShoshoneLuxembourger
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.5%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.9%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.37
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.0%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
35.3%
Exceptional
29.4%

Shoshone vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 101.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 33.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 2.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 19.2%).
Shoshone vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricShoshoneLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.5%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.9%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
24.9%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Excellent
6.6%

Shoshone vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 40.0%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 39.5%), and master's degree (11.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.17%).
Shoshone vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricShoshoneLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Average
92.5%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.7%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.1%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.3%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.4%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.3%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.1%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Excellent
1.9%

Shoshone vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 39.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 36.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 5.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and disability age over 75 (49.9% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 11.2%).
Shoshone vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricShoshoneLuxembourger
Disability
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.9%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.2%