Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,429,456 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Immigrant from Thailand communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.252. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Thailand within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Thailand corresponds to a decrease of 8.7 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,289 compared to $46,213, a difference of 9.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,337 compared to $97,159, a difference of 6.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,400 compared to $103,412, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,645 compared to $52,440, a difference of 3.5%), householder income over 65 years ($60,217 compared to $62,354, a difference of 3.5%), and median female earnings ($38,810 compared to $40,353, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (17.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 11.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 11.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.89%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 12.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.4%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.7%), and births to unmarried women (32.8% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.25%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.95%), and family households (63.8% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 15.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.1%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.9%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 18.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.6%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).