Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,364,844 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Immigrant from Sri Lanka communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sri Lanka within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sri Lanka corresponds to an increase of 6.7 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($119,094 compared to $103,412, a difference of 15.2%), median family income ($120,263 compared to $105,655, a difference of 13.8%), and median household income ($99,943 compared to $88,388, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,512 compared to $52,440, a difference of 4.0%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and per capita income ($50,555 compared to $46,213, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 20.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.1%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and single male poverty (11.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.87%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.73%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 14.8%), divorced or separated (10.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.1%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.43%), family households (65.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.91%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 2.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.16%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 32.8%), master's degree (19.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 18.7%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 14.3%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.82%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.87%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.7%).