Crow vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,704,117 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.771. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.261% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 261.4 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $46,213, a difference of 45.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $103,412, a difference of 39.3%), and median household income ($63,681 compared to $88,388, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $52,440, a difference of 11.6%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $40,353, a difference of 14.4%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $47,697, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 93.2%), single male poverty (23.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 92.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 88.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 16.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 20.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 29.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 253.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 231.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 227.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 60.2%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 29.4%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (65.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 28.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 19.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.25%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 66.7%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 57.7%), and bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.51%), 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 48.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 44.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.010%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.7%).