Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Bangladesh
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Bangladesh

Immigrants from Chile

Poor
Good
2,108
SOCIAL INDEX
18.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
269th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Chile Integration in Immigrants from Bangladesh Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,017,322 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Immigrant from Bangladesh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.046. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bangladesh within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bangladesh corresponds to an increase of 1.1 Immigrants from Chile.
Immigrants from Bangladesh Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Immigrants from Chile Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.9% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 22.8%), householder income over 65 years ($55,394 compared to $62,354, a difference of 12.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($92,208 compared to $103,412, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,910 compared to $40,353, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,714 compared to $52,440, a difference of 4.3%), and median earnings ($45,532 compared to $47,697, a difference of 4.8%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Immigrants from Chile Income
Income MetricImmigrants from BangladeshImmigrants from Chile
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,709
Exceptional
$46,213
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,665
Excellent
$105,655
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,722
Excellent
$88,388
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,532
Excellent
$47,697
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,642
Excellent
$55,954
Median Female Earnings
Good
$39,910
Good
$40,353
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,714
Good
$52,440
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$90,448
Excellent
$97,159
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$92,208
Excellent
$103,412
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,394
Excellent
$62,354
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.9%
Average
25.7%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 41.6%), receiving food stamps (15.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 38.5%), and family poverty (11.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 3.7%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and single mother poverty (31.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 9.7%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from BangladeshImmigrants from Chile
Poverty
Tragic
15.3%
Average
12.2%
Families
Tragic
11.7%
Average
8.9%
Males
Tragic
14.1%
Average
11.1%
Females
Tragic
16.4%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.8%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.1%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Good
15.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Good
15.9%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Tragic
22.3%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.1%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.5%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
11.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
13.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.9%
Good
11.5%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 28.5%), unemployment (6.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.6%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from BangladeshImmigrants from Chile
Unemployment
Tragic
6.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
6.5%
Average
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.2%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
18.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.8%
Good
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.4%
Fair
5.5%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.0% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.2%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from BangladeshImmigrants from Chile
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.0%
Tragic
34.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.6%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.0%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.6%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.7%
Exceptional
83.2%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.4%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.9%), and married-couple households (43.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.35%), births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 0.95%), and family households (63.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from BangladeshImmigrants from Chile
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Good
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.1%
Average
46.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.36
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.9%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.0%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.9%
Good
31.2%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 134.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 55.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.3% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 19.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.8% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 39.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 50.3%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from BangladeshImmigrants from Chile
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
25.8%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
74.3%
Poor
89.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
38.8%
Poor
54.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.5%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
3.9%
Poor
6.1%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 44.5%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.5%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from BangladeshImmigrants from Chile
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Poor
97.4%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Poor
97.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.0%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.5%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.5%
Fair
88.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.9%
Average
85.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.3%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.2%
Exceptional
49.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.8%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Exceptional
16.8%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Exceptional
2.1%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Immigrants from Chile Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 50.6%), hearing disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and female disability (11.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Immigrants from Chile Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from BangladeshImmigrants from Chile
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.85%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%