Navajo vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

COMPARE

Navajo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Navajo

Immigrants from Chile

Poor
Good
1,296
SOCIAL INDEX
10.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
316th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Chile Integration in Navajo Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,293,851 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.285. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to a decrease of 4.6 Immigrants from Chile.
Navajo Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

Navajo vs Immigrants from Chile Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $46,213, a difference of 59.2%), median household income ($59,159 compared to $88,388, a difference of 49.4%), and median family income ($70,989 compared to $105,655, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 15.0%), median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $40,353, a difference of 22.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $52,440, a difference of 23.7%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Chile Income
Income MetricNavajoImmigrants from Chile
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$29,031
Exceptional
$46,213
Median Family Income
Tragic
$70,989
Excellent
$105,655
Median Household Income
Tragic
$59,159
Excellent
$88,388
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,999
Excellent
$47,697
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,098
Excellent
$55,954
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,046
Good
$40,353
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$42,380
Good
$52,440
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$66,529
Excellent
$97,159
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$69,759
Excellent
$103,412
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$47,722
Excellent
$62,354
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.4%
Average
25.7%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 124.1%), family poverty (18.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 111.5%), and single male poverty (25.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 109.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 41.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 46.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 49.0%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty
Poverty MetricNavajoImmigrants from Chile
Poverty
Tragic
23.1%
Average
12.2%
Families
Tragic
18.8%
Average
8.9%
Males
Tragic
22.3%
Average
11.1%
Females
Tragic
23.9%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
23.3%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
31.6%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
30.2%
Good
15.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
30.3%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
30.5%
Good
15.9%
Single Males
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
29.2%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
40.2%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.9%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
11.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
13.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.1%
Good
11.5%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 110.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 99.7%), and male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 92.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 30.3%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNavajoImmigrants from Chile
Unemployment
Tragic
8.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
7.3%
Average
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
18.6%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
29.0%
Tragic
18.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.2%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
10.6%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.9%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.7%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
14.2%
Good
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.2%
Fair
5.5%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (56.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 16.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 15.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (73.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 13.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 14.3%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNavajoImmigrants from Chile
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
56.6%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.2%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
32.1%
Tragic
34.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
64.8%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.6%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
73.8%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
73.8%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Exceptional
83.2%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 65.1%), single father households (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 45.4%), and single mother households (8.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.89%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households (66.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.8%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNavajoImmigrants from Chile
Family Households
Exceptional
66.4%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Good
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.1%
Average
46.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.65
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.8%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.0%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Good
31.2%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 35.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 16.6%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNavajoImmigrants from Chile
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.8%
Poor
89.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.3%
Poor
54.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.3%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Poor
6.1%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 83.3%), master's degree (9.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 77.9%), and bachelor's degree (23.6% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 73.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.080%), 5th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.080%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level
Education Level MetricNavajoImmigrants from Chile
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.1%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Fair
97.4%
Poor
97.4%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Poor
97.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Poor
95.8%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.3%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.0%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.1%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.2%
Fair
88.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.5%
Average
85.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.3%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.8%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
32.6%
Exceptional
49.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
16.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.1%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Chile Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 64.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 53.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (33.3% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.83%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 10.5%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.9%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Chile Disability
Disability MetricNavajoImmigrants from Chile
Disability
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
33.3%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
58.3%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.6%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.4%