Asian vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,257,863 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.040. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 0.1 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $97,159, a difference of 16.0%), median household income ($101,681 compared to $88,388, a difference of 15.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $103,412, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 4.7%), per capita income ($50,057 compared to $46,213, a difference of 8.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $52,440, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 18.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 17.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 6.8%), single father poverty (14.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and single male poverty (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 11.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.44%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 16.4%), divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.8%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.28 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.3%), family households (66.5% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 22.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.4%), no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.060%), 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and 8th grade (95.2% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 18.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.8%).