Immigrants from Austria vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,803,784 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Immigrant from Austria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.769. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Austria within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.329% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Austria corresponds to an increase of 328.8 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,503 compared to $46,213, a difference of 13.6%), median male earnings ($62,164 compared to $55,954, a difference of 11.1%), and median family income ($116,830 compared to $105,655, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,400 compared to $52,440, a difference of 0.080%), median female earnings ($42,824 compared to $40,353, a difference of 6.1%), and median household income ($95,277 compared to $88,388, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 21.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 18.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.080%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 5.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.87%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.6%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.2%), family households (63.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.95%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.28%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 29.8%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.9%), and professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.55%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 16.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and male disability (11.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.2%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%).