Pima vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,484,147 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.162. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 7.8 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $46,213, a difference of 50.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $103,412, a difference of 41.0%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $88,388, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $52,440, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $40,353, a difference of 14.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $97,159, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 115.7%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 106.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 93.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 6.2%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 36.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 46.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 164.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 112.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 111.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 14.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 90.4%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 65.1%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.0%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 29.6%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 28.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 81.3%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 76.0%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 62.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.23%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 75.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 59.4%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 10.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.4%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.5%).