Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,651,896 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.742. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 20.3 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $62,354, a difference of 3.3%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $52,440, a difference of 2.4%), and per capita income ($45,220 compared to $46,213, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $40,353, a difference of 0.14%), median earnings ($47,617 compared to $47,697, a difference of 0.17%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $103,412, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 13.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.21%), female poverty (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 10.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.67%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.0%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.5% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.30%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and family households (64.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 25.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 15.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.2%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 14.3%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.020%), 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.030%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.83%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.6%).