Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,262,451 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.248. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to a decrease of 24.5 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 59.0%), householder income over 65 years ($50,747 compared to $62,354, a difference of 22.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $103,412, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $40,353, a difference of 3.9%), householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $52,440, a difference of 4.0%), and median earnings ($45,596 compared to $47,697, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 54.8%), family poverty (12.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 39.4%), and married-couple family poverty (7.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 6.9%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and single father poverty (16.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (7.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 47.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 42.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 37.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.4%), married-couple households (37.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 24.1%), and currently married (39.1% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (62.6% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.24, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 240.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 121.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 107.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 42.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 89.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 107.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 53.6%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 40.7%), and no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 36.0%), hearing disability (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.2%).