Immigrants from South Africa vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,330,616 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Immigrant from South Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.920. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.402% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Africa corresponds to an increase of 402.3 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($62,899 compared to $55,954, a difference of 12.4%), per capita income ($51,465 compared to $46,213, a difference of 11.4%), and wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,705 compared to $52,440, a difference of 1.4%), median female earnings ($42,508 compared to $40,353, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,234 compared to $62,354, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 18.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 0.12%), single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.40%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.93%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.8%), births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.49%), family households (63.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 1.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.7%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.1%), and professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 11.3%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.37%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.72%), and disability (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.3%).