Immigrants from Cambodia vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,554,131 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Immigrant from Cambodia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.382. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cambodia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cambodia corresponds to a decrease of 8.7 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,434 compared to $46,213, a difference of 14.3%), wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 10.5%), and median family income ($97,222 compared to $105,655, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,450 compared to $52,440, a difference of 0.020%), median female earnings ($38,833 compared to $40,353, a difference of 3.9%), and median earnings ($45,090 compared to $47,697, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 20.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 14.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 13.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 12.5%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.9%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.6%), and births to unmarried women (34.8% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.4%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.86%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 60.6%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 44.5%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 18.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.3% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.1%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 7.6%).