Samoan vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

COMPARE

Samoan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Samoans

Immigrants from Chile

Fair
Good
4,237
SOCIAL INDEX
39.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
202nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Chile Integration in Samoan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,481,385 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Samoan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.725. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Samoans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Samoans corresponds to an increase of 12.4 Immigrants from Chile.
Samoan Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

Samoan vs Immigrants from Chile Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,826 compared to $46,213, a difference of 16.0%), median male earnings ($51,389 compared to $55,954, a difference of 8.9%), and median earnings ($44,206 compared to $47,697, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 0.97%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,580 compared to $103,412, a difference of 1.8%), and median household income ($86,498 compared to $88,388, a difference of 2.2%).
Samoan vs Immigrants from Chile Income
Income MetricSamoanImmigrants from Chile
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,826
Exceptional
$46,213
Median Family Income
Fair
$100,344
Excellent
$105,655
Median Household Income
Good
$86,498
Excellent
$88,388
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,206
Excellent
$47,697
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,389
Excellent
$55,954
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,498
Good
$40,353
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,610
Good
$52,440
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,385
Excellent
$97,159
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,580
Excellent
$103,412
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,427
Excellent
$62,354
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.0%
Average
25.7%

Samoan vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 19.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.2%), and single father poverty (13.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.36%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.74%).
Samoan vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty
Poverty MetricSamoanImmigrants from Chile
Poverty
Good
12.0%
Average
12.2%
Families
Good
8.6%
Average
8.9%
Males
Good
10.9%
Average
11.1%
Females
Good
13.1%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.5%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.6%
Good
15.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Good
15.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
13.8%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
13.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Fair
12.1%
Good
11.5%

Samoan vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 16.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.4%).
Samoan vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSamoanImmigrants from Chile
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Average
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Tragic
18.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Average
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Good
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.4%
Fair
5.5%

Samoan vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
Samoan vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSamoanImmigrants from Chile
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.5%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.1%
Tragic
34.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.3%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.3%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.2%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
83.2%

Samoan vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.6%), family households with children (29.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.7%), and average family size (3.42 compared to 3.24, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.8% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.86%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.90%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 4.5%).
Samoan vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSamoanImmigrants from Chile
Family Households
Exceptional
67.9%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.5%
Good
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.7%
Average
46.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.42
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.5%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Average
46.8%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.6%
Good
31.2%

Samoan vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 51.9%), no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 44.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 32.7%).
Samoan vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSamoanImmigrants from Chile
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Poor
89.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.5%
Poor
54.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
25.0%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.2%
Poor
6.1%

Samoan vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 58.3%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 48.0%), and master's degree (11.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.4% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.030%).
Samoan vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level
Education Level MetricSamoanImmigrants from Chile
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Poor
97.4%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Poor
97.2%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Poor
94.6%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.8%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Fair
88.9%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Average
85.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.0%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.1%
Exceptional
49.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
16.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.1%

Samoan vs Immigrants from Chile Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 19.3%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.1%).
Samoan vs Immigrants from Chile Disability
Disability MetricSamoanImmigrants from Chile
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.5%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Poor
2.2%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%