Immigrants from Belize vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,986,856 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Immigrant from Belize communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.159. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belize within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belize corresponds to a decrease of 17.2 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 21.0%), per capita income ($38,614 compared to $46,213, a difference of 19.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,229 compared to $103,412, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,223 compared to $52,440, a difference of 2.4%), median female earnings ($37,056 compared to $40,353, a difference of 8.9%), and median earnings ($42,339 compared to $47,697, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 32.6%), family poverty (11.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 29.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.2%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and single mother poverty (31.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 29.6%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.3%), births to unmarried women (37.3% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 19.7%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.050%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and family households (64.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 39.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.9% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.51%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 58.5%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 52.2%), and no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.95%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.96%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 17.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.8% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.70%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.2%).