Immigrants from Armenia vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,382,792 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Immigrant from Armenia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.208. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Armenia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Armenia corresponds to a decrease of 2.8 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.7% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 24.1%), householder income over 65 years ($53,974 compared to $62,354, a difference of 15.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,863 compared to $103,412, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,340 compared to $40,353, a difference of 0.030%), householder income under 25 years ($52,986 compared to $52,440, a difference of 1.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,867 compared to $97,159, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 34.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 31.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.86%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 40.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 39.5%), and unemployment (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.0% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 19.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.7% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.3%), births to unmarried women (26.1% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 19.7%), and divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.35 compared to 3.24, a difference of 3.5%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.6%), no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.4% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.40%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 53.7%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 22.2%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 76.5%), disability age under 5 (0.76% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 69.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.0%), male disability (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.3%).